Latest IELTS Exam Essays 2022
24 September 2022, IELTS Exam, Writing Task 2, Morning Slot, INDIA
Some people believe that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary epoch, advertisements have become an integral part of our lives and are embedded in all entertainment forms. A section of society postulates that authorities should ban advertisements that focus on children. This essay entirely agrees with this statement because they waste children’s quality time and alter their minds.
To begin with, the advertisements coming on various platforms such as television, FM radio, websites and chatting applications waste the quality time of children. The content of commercials that aim at children is usually catchy for young minds, and their humour makes the children watch them repeatedly. Due to this, the school-going educatees spend a sizeable proportion of their time watching and listening to promotions which they need to spend on studies. A recent study by The Times of India has revealed that with the advent of social media, the time spent by children on advertisements has increased substantially.
Apart from this, advertisements aimed at children usually impact the children’s mindset adversely. There is no denying this conviction that the facts described in the commercials are generally exaggerated, and the tender minds of school-going learners are not developed enough to decipher the truth. Hence in some cases, the children fall into the trap of advertisers and develop wrong beliefs, which are counter-productive for them in the long run. Soft drinks are a prime example of detrimental to children’s health, whereas television commercials project them as energy drinks, with celebrities performing numerous stunts after consuming them.
To conclude, restricting advertisements focusing on young children is prudent because, firstly, such commercials lead to squandering time and play with children’s mindsets.
24 September 2022, IELTS Exam, Writing Task 2, Evening Slot, INDIA.
Some people think that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A few individuals opine that the presence of weapons with a police officer motivates a higher degree of violence. I entirely disagree with this statement because only trained cops get guns; secondly, the availability of weapons to police ensures discipline.
To commence with, the prominent reason behind police officers carrying weapons is that officer they are professionally trained under testing circumstances to use a gun. Moreover, they use the guns in case of a situation when it’s extremely necessary and that too before taking the permission of their seniors. Apart from this, they have to give the record of every bullet they fire to this department. Hence, the chances of misuse are minimal. India is the primary example where the number of police officers who have to fire a gun after joining the job is extremely low.
Furthermore, there is no denying this conviction that weapons with police officers act as a deterrent for offenders because guns are worthwhile to maintain discipline in society. Moreover, a few criminals are physically very strong. Thus they have the potential to overpower the police officer, so, in such circumstances, a gun provides confidence to the cops to handle the conflicts adroitly. To illustrate, a document by BBC news revealed a situation where police officers easily handled a skirmish between two people by pointing guns. Thus, a pistol is valuable for an officer to handle challenging circumstances prudently without violence.
To conclude, the presence of weapons with the placement is prudent because it helps them maintain law and order. Moreover, it safeguards the citizens’ lives during unforeseen contingencies such as burglaries, kidnappings and gang wars.
Essay topic: (Reported on 23rd April)
Some people say that art subjects such as music, drama and creative writing are an essential part of education, and every school should include them in its syllabus.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.
A few people assert that art subjects such as music, drama, and creative writing are an essential part of education, and every school should include them in its syllabus. I agree with this statement. Art helps in the growth of the creative faculties of the brain, like the frontal cortex and hippocampus. Moreover, art helps children to destress after long hours of study.
Art subjects such as music, drama and creative writing are an essential part of education. Many neurological studies were conducted on children to learn about the benefits of art education. Many scientists found that learning to play a new instrument helps the brain’s fostering, and the synapses of neurons get strengthened. Creative writing causes the parietal-temporal region of the brain to get activated, thus strengthening the frontal cortex. For example, many studies have depicted that students or children who participate in various creative subjects have more problem-solving capabilities than their counterparts. They try to solve the problems with an optimistic viewpoint, and these children become more confident than others.
Moreover, art helps children to destress. Hours of analytical learning in schools like mathematics, science and social studies can cause the tiredness of the brain. Children feel joyful, contented and happy while learning to play a new instrument or act in a drama or paint or write something creatively. The children feel relaxed and at ease while doing something from the art subject. A recent study has revealed that art decreases cortisol, a stress hormone in students. For example, those schools that have embedded art subjects in their syllabus have seen more productivity in their students. Students of such schools participate more actively in the class and are more attentive. They even perform well while answering the questions of the teachers.
So, it is not wrong to say that art subjects such as creative writing, music and drama should be an integral part of the school curriculum.
Essay topic: (Reported on 21st April)
Some people say that dangerous sports should be banned since they are deadly and life-threatening.
Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
A few individuals opine that dangerous physical activities such as sky diving and skiing are risky, and higher authorities must proscribe them. Even though violent sports help people keep fit, I completely agree that they should be prohibited because it has increased the death rate and is for mere thrill-seekers.
One of the primary reasons some people assert that individuals must refrain from participating in adrenaline-raising sports is the increased death toll for its partakers. When athletes take part in training sessions or competitions, they undergo rigorous exercises in an unfriendly environment, which may lead to serious health issues such as a broken bone or muscular dystrophy. During treatment, most sports stars may become disabled for life or death. For example, according to the National Geographic statistics, in 2017, in the US, more than 150 skiers were buried in avalanches, although most of them were highly skilled. Thus, adventurous sports cause the death of many enthusiasts who venture into them.
Furthermore, people who are involved in dangerous sports are mere thrill-seekers. In other words, professionals tend to exhibit exquisite talents and unique movements to thrill their audience and gain cheap popularity at the expense of their safety. As a result, sports stars get unmatched excitement for themselves from their performances, which are meaningless to society. For instance, a skydiver, James Owen, confessed in an interview with a national geographic reporter that he went into skydiving because of the profound feeling of excitement that he derives from it.
In conclusion, although partakers of extreme sports are keen on continuing, I am in solidarity with the view that there should be a ban on them because of the physical risk involved and increased incidence of mortality.